Research integrity and scholarly publishing
Douglas N. Arnold

I am very concerned with questions of research integrity and scholarly mathematical publication. Some documents relevant to this which I authored or coauthored are linked here.

• Integrity Under Attack: The State of Scholarly Publishing (editorial for SIAM News, December 2009)
  translations to other languages:    中文    Español    Português
• Nefarious Numbers (a paper on impact factor manipulation, published in AMS Notices, March 2011)
translation:    Русский
• Singapore Statement on Research Integrity (I participated in the drafting as a delegate to WCRI 2010)
• IMU document on Best Current Practices for Journals, adopted August 2010
• More reasons to support the Elsevier boycott (blog posting, February 2012)
• Mathematicians take a stand (the case for the Elsevier boycott, published in AMS Notices, June 2012)

These are the ratings for math journals releated by the Australian Research Council in 2010. I find them significantly more reliable than ratings based on citation data alone. The full ratings, covering 20,712 peer-reviewed journals in a wide range of fields (math, physics, law, education, ...) can be found here.