Score
|
Writing
|
Pictures / Diagrams
|
3
|
Clear, complete
exposition. A joy to read.
|
Good, neatly drawn (or computer
generated) pictures which are well labeled and contribute to the
reader's understanding of the problem and solution.
|
2
|
Adequately organized, with
reasonable explanations of mathematical reasoning; references (such as
named of theorems used) are given. Reaonsably neat.
|
Pictures exist which provide
some insight into the problem, or at least document what has been
done.
|
1
|
Hard to follow and/or poorly
organized. Lacking explanations for steps in the
solution. |
Pictures exist, but they do not
aid in the understanding of the problem. Labels may be
missing. Alternatively, there many be too many pictures, which is
generally a detriment to the solution. (Example: a diagram of 5
line segments does not require 5 separate accompanying pictures of each
individual line segment.)
|
0
|
Illegible or impossible to
follow.
|
Pictures are either missing, or
bear no relation to the problem at hand.
|